Truth about Gaddafi Libya that NATO, CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera & CO Keep Hidden

Demoralized with wars in Iraq in Afghanistan, oil hungry West decided to discredit and depose Gadhafi at a time when he was fighting Al Qaeda terrorism. In fact, Gadhafi was the first world leader to condemn Al Qaeda as a terrorist group in the early part of the 2000s. Not only that, the Libyan leader has even adopted progressive or humanitarian policies in the domestic and international arenas such that he was even scheduled to receive a humanitarian award from no less than the Human Rights Council of the United Nations in March of this year. He was to be cited for his human rights record, including his stand on women's rights, his opposition to the more oppressive features of Islamic Sharia law, and his record on religious and ethnic tolerance and social inclusion.
The UN Human Rights Council working group report released on January 4, 2011 virtually serves as a glowing praise of Qaddafi's leadership in Human Rights. Additionally, it is worth noting that based on human development indicators, Libya Arab Jamarihiya has been many notches higher than the rest of the world, much more the Arab states.

The Libyan war: Unconstitutional and illegitimate
The Anglo-French-American war on most prosperous country in Africa is opposed by countries representing majority of the human race regardless of massive propaganda by NATO puppets Al Jazeera, The New York Times, CNN, BBC and the rest of the western media.

There is no doubt that U.S. participation in the Anglo-French-American attack on Libya is completely unconstitutional.

Before becoming president Barack Obama, a graduate of Harvard Law School and a former law professor, accurately described the limits of a president's authority to initiate a war in cases where the U.S. has neither been attacked nor is in imminent danger of attack:

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

The current aggression against once independent Libya is a perfect case of "a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." While the president is limited by the Constitution to repelling or forestalling attack, Congress can declare war for a variety of purposes beyond simple defense

In the case of the Libyan war, the presidential power grab is even more blatant, because weak, poor countries on the Security Council have acted as ventriloquists' puppets for the U.S., Britain and France.

Including the United States, the Security Council nations that voted for the no-fly zone resolution have a combined population of a little more than 700 million people and a combined GDP, in terms of purchasing power parity, of roughly $20 trillion. The Security Council countries that showed their disapproval of the Libyan war by abstaining from the vote have a combined population of about 3 billion people and a GDP of around $21 trillion.

If the U.S. is factored out, the disproportion between the pro-war and anti-war camps on the Security Council is even more striking.. The countries that joined the U.S. in voting to authorize attacks on Libya, including Britain and France, have a combined population that adds up to a little more than 5 percent of the human race.

The truth is that the U.S. is joined in its war on Libya by only two second-rank great powers, Britain and France, which between them carved up North Africa and the Middle East a century ago, slaughtering and torturing many Arabs and Blacks Libyans in the process. Every other major power on earth opposed the Anglo-French-American attack in North Africa, registering that opposition by abstentions rather than "no" votes in the Security Council (in a fear of been trashed and demonized by obedient to NATO western media that basically controls 80% of worlds information space).


Hardons comment:

Well Libya is 'Liberated' there lust for Coco Cola, McDonalds, Tesco's and all the other Jewish owned corporations will be brought to there doorsteps. At what price? 


Western style 'Democracy'? I don't think so, look at the the so-called liberators? Do they look like they are 'Democratic'. Shouting 'Allah Akbar' as they rape, torture and kill people indiscriminately? The new model for Libya will be based on Saudi Arabia, strict shariah law will be enforced by the Muslim hierarchy who take their orders direct from Washington and London. 

For the Corporations and the Bankers this is their big 'Bonus' paid for by the working class suckers in the west. Make no mistake they will bleed Libya dry, it will become a hell on earth for the ordinary people. Once 'Usary' is forced upon them they will be wishing to Allah that Gaddafi had not been assassinated by the Zionist scum that are already making everyone's life in the West unbearable.

Watching a BBC News report earlier, I saw a so-called Liberator with a message written in English on his back stating: 'We are coming for you next Syria' Then what Iran, Pakistan?  


Still don't believe that the Zionist New World Order does not control things? Well you better wake up people because once Islam is under the control of the Zionists then we will all rue the day that Hillary Clinton laughed as she said: "We came we saw, he died" Because she means anyone who stands in their way.


This is all WE want: An ordinary fucking life